Search for: "A.T.3" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
  Grisham's book is eerily like the true story of Supreme Court of West Virginia Justice Brent Benjamin who ruled in favor of the $3,000,000 campaign donor, Don Blankenship, the CEO of A.T. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:23 pm by brian
West Virginia coal magnate Don Blankenship had spent some $3 million in 2004 to help elect a state supreme court justice when Blankenship’s A.T. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
  The map shows a parcel with no parcel number (referring to Page 39), and it is labeled “A.T. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:45 am by admin
In re A.T. (05-10-00363-CV) – Recites well-established (1) standard for reviewing an order granting or denying a bill of review; (2) under an abuse of discretion standard, legal and factual insufficiency are not independent grounds for reversal; and (3) statute of limitations applicable to bills of review. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm by The Legal Blog
., (1991) 3 SCC 600, observed as under: The foundation of our system which is based on the independence and impartiality of those who man it will be shaken if disparaging and derogatory remarks are made against the presiding judicial officer with impunity....It is high time that we realise that much cherished judicial independence has to be protected not only from the executive or the legislature but also from those who are an integral part of the system. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:50 am
65 Mattel 66 Booz Allen Hamilton 67 Boeing 68 HSBC 69 eBay 70 Hilton Hotels Corporation 71 Siemens 72 Amgen 73 A.T. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:14 am by Steve Hall
—had just donated $3 million to his judicial election campaign. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:56 pm by Tuan Samahon
Subsequently, a plaintiff moved to have Benjamin disqualified from a case in which A.T. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mississippi is procedurally defaulted; 3) defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the penalty instructions; and 4) a state court's analysis under Beck was reasonable as it is well established that a lesser-included offense instruction is not required where the facts of a murder so strongly indicate intent to kill that the jury could not rationally have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant'! [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mississippi is procedurally defaulted; 3) defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the penalty instructions; and 4) a state court's analysis under Beck was reasonable as it is well established that a lesser-included offense instruction is not required where the facts of a murder so strongly indicate intent to kill that the jury could not rationally have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant'! [read post]