Search for: "AA v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: How High are Individual Income Tax Rates in Your State? [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
So, clearing the decks… AA v Rodriguez & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDERS – defence of “insanity”) (2021) UKUT 269 (LC) The Upper Tribunal found that in making Rent Repayment Orders for an unlicensed HMO, the FTT had not had sufficient regard to medical evidence and evidence from social workers that strongly suggested the landlord was suffering from serious mental health issues which would mean that he did not know his conduct in… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Chukwuma Okoli
See also AIC Ltd v Edo State Government (2016) LPELR-40132 (CA). [12] (2021) 13 NWLR (Pt. 1794) 434. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm by Luis Franco
“2019 was a big deal for Accessibility, after the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Robles v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm by INFORRM
Canada AA v BB 2021 ONCA 147  the Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff’s appeal against the dismissal of a slander claim. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:49 am by Ntokozo Ngubane
In the circumstances, Afrisam requested the Fund to invoke the provisions of section 37D(1)(b)(ii)(aa) and withhold the applicant’s withdrawal benefit. [read post]