Search for: "ABBEY v. US "
Results 41 - 60
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
For those who don't live in or near London, Parliament Square Gardens (PSG) is the area of grass surrounded by statues and walkway which sits between the Houses of Parliament, Westminster Abbey and the new Supreme Court building. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am
It will undoubtedly be in every land law examination paper for the next 10 years, just like Boland, Flegg and Abbey National BS v Cann. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Gall’s cultural identity and offered to loan the manuscripts to the Abbey Library.[8] The parties were able to analyze the issues at hand, and split interests into “title” and “use” of the objects. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
UPDATE: Instapundit reader Drew Kelley recommends the current season of Downton Abbey if they’re looking for a WWI-era setting. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
The Supreme Court will determine whether Nuffield Health is entitled to this mandatory relief in respect of its occupation of its members-only gym at Merton Abbey. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
The section provides for a mandatory 80% relief from non-domestic rates on premises which are occupied by a charity and used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech &… [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:45 pm
In today’s case (Schuk v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 8:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
There was some discussion as to whether there were two transactions (transfer to Mrs D, then mortgage) or one (on the principle of Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, but of course either transaction taken individually or both taken together involved one and one only recipient of the purchase money. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
There was some discussion as to whether there were two transactions (transfer to Mrs D, then mortgage) or one (on the principle of Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, but of course either transaction taken individually or both taken together involved one and one only recipient of the purchase money. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm
Dette vil være tilfelle ved dypdykk i de fleste tema. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Goodwin v NGN (b) Which three letters have been used to anonymise a Claimant and also a Defendant this year? [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:50 am
A more useful test might be found in R. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
See Abbey Co., LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There are diverging views in this respect, as seen recently in the Responses to the Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules (see hereat Section V). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 4:47 am
In 2010, in Vernor v Autodesk, the US District Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in fact that "a software user is a licensee rather than an owner of a copy where the copyright owner (1) specifies that the user is granted a license; (2) significantly restricts the user's ability to transfer the software; and (3) imposes notable use restrictions. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
In 2010, in Vernor v Autodesk, the US District Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in fact that "a software user is a licensee rather than an owner of a copy where the copyright owner (1) specifies that the user is granted a license; (2) significantly restricts the user's ability to transfer the software; and (3) imposes notable use restrictions. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:31 pm
For example, the recent Ontario Divisional Court decisions in Abbey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
Given that at least two of those cases remain subject to ongoing appeal proceedings (Fisher v Brooker, the "Whiter Shade of Pale" case, is awaiting judgement in the House of Lords and Football Association Premier League Limited and others v QC Leisure, the case concerning smartcards for foreign satellite transmissions, is pending before the European Court of Justice), another edition very soon will doubtless be justified. [read post]
