Search for: "AC v. AC" Results 41 - 60 of 3,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 11:54 am by Workplace Prof
Her discussion highlights the importance of (and arguments in) the ACS issue brief,... [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:14 am
The description of the opinions in the merger agreement appears to indicate that they didn't: "(v) Opinion of Financial Advisors. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:39 am
Seaga v Harper Privy Council “The defence of qualified privilege established in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ([2001] 2 AC 127) was available not only to the press and broadcasting media but could also extend to the publication by any person of material of public interest. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
In AC Ward & Son Ltd v Catlin (Five) Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 3122 (Comm), the claimant, AC Ward & Son Limited (AC Ward) was the owner of a warehouse in Essex, which was left unoccupied at weekends. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In later cases, the House of Lords likewise resisted attempts to use Art 8 as a defence to possession proceedings by local authorities: see Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465; [2006] HLR 22; Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 AC 367, [2008] HLR 45. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
Tomorrow, the ACS is having a panel discussion on Panetti v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
    [1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 4:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  There is nothing wrong with the ACS approach. [read post]