Search for: "ADOPTION OF C F B JR" Results 41 - 60 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2021, 7:06 am by Bryce Klehm
       (g)  To implement the policy set forth in subsection (f) of this section:           (i) Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense acting through the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), the Attorney General, and the Director of OMB, shall recommend to the FAR Council contract language that identifies:… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Validly adopted legislative rules are identical to statutes in their impact on all relevant legal actors—those subject to their constraints, those responsible for their administration, and judges or others who may have occasion to consider them in the course of their activities. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:27 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 (b) After property is seized pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, regardless of whether the civil complaint has been filed, all settlements must be personally approved by the head of the law enforcement agency that seized the property. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
 (b) After property is seized pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, regardless of whether the civil complaint has been filed, all settlements must be personally approved by the head of the law enforcement agency that seized the property. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
 (b) After property is seized pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, regardless of whether the civil complaint has been filed, all settlements must be personally approved by the head of the law enforcement agency that seized the property. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The ACPA essentially adopts this same distinction. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
Persons do not carry hepatitis A long-term as with hepatitis B and C. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Supreme Court determined that there was no private right of action for aiding and abetting a violation of 1934 Act Rule 10b-5 (adopted under § 10(b) in Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]