Search for: "ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE SERVICES INCORPORATED"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Specifically, youth and their advocates should consider incorporating arguments relating to education and normalcy. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
The description of the product sounds like it is rather expensive, so it's unclear why that SME couldn't afford WiFi. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:03 pm
The act takes aim at “ensuring an abundant and affordable supply of highly nutritious fruits, vegetables, and other specialty crops for American consumers and international markets. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Purdue incorporated the civil settlement into its plan of reorganization, but the district court subsequently reversed a bankruptcy court order confirming the plan and litigation over the plan continues. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
Both sides appealed. 512(f) and the proper standard The DMCA in part provides a safe harbor from liability for infringing material uploaded to online service providers by third parties for purposes of storage if (among other requirements) those service providers remove the material upon notice by the copyright owner. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 11:09 am
This is a statistic that no law firm can afford to ignore. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Despite the logic, justness, and legality of affording restitution to these victims,8 over the last several years the right of these victims to full restitution has become a contested issue in the federal district courts.9 Some courts refuse to afford any restitution, others award de minimus restitution, and another awarded the full amount of requested restitution in excess of $3,000,000.10 The different outcomes can be attributed in significant part to varied legal interpretations… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:30 pm
The challenged provisions include a series of promises historically included in many provider agreements such as provisions requiring that the private payer: To steer plan members to participating providers; Not to steer plan members away from participating providers; To include Atrium providers in any new networks or preferential treatment afforded to any other contracting provider in new or all plans, products, networks and preferred provider classifications; and Not to exclude from… [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
High Sierra Rural Alliance v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The trial court denied Petitioners’ petition for writ of mandate because the City’s determination that the project was consistent with the general plan density requirements was supported by substantial evidence found in the General Plan itself which incorporates community plan policies which anticipated subsequent modifications for site specific conditions, coupled with implementing hillside protection regulations that limits actual developable area of a parcel. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The trial court denied Petitioners’ petition for writ of mandate because the City’s determination that the project was consistent with the general plan density requirements was supported by substantial evidence found in the General Plan itself which incorporates community plan policies which anticipated subsequent modifications for site specific conditions, coupled with implementing hillside protection regulations that limits actual developable area of a parcel. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Here, the appellant argued that the unusual circumstances applied because of (1) potential soil contamination from the former operations of the Goodyear Service Center, (2) unusually large number of fueling pumps, and (3) the efforts required to reroute traffic. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning criteria are met. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning criteria are met. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
It cited Joshua Tree Downtown Business Alliance v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
You can afford to go to jail even less!!! [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
