Search for: "AMAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
The prefatory language said: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
In America's Unwritten Constitution, Akhil Reed Amar wrote "Washington defined the archetypical presidential role," and "[a]s America's first 'first man,' [he] set precedents from his earliest moments on the job. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
The other major jurisdiction that specifically prohibits the destruction of art is India - a principle that was established by a seminal judicial precedent, Amar Nath Sehgal v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
These documents, eventually known as the Pentagon Papers, chronicled the United States’ involvement with Vietnam for decades. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Civil Liberties website: Writing in McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
It is often (and rightly) said today that there are many people and forces working to divide America. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
“Black’s words are cool, not hot,” Akhil Amar explains in the foreword to the second edition. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am
Let’s begin with Bingham’s text: No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
In 1984, United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
