Search for: "APPLICATION OF GILLETTE" Results 41 - 60 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 6:54 am by Bart Torvik
Marshals Service, been deliberately deceiving judges and defendants about their use of a controversial surveillance tool to track suspects, according to newly obtained emails.At the request of the Marshals Service, the officers using so-called stingrays have been routinely telling judges, in applications for warrants, that they obtained knowledge of a suspect’s location from a “confidential source” rather than disclosing that the information was gleaned using a… [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:07 am by Bart Torvik
Thus, the 35% rate bracket applies to income above $250,000 (that is "income in the highest rate bracket") as long as it does not exceed "the applicable threshold" ($450,000) minus "the dollar amount at which [the highest rate bracket] begins" ($250,000). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:08 am by INFORRM
  On 21 June 2010, the solicitors for the respondents wrote to the court indicating that they opposed the application on the grounds that it would increase costs and as the interveners were seeking to advance similar arguments to the appellants, effectively “ganging up” on the claimants. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 1:41 am
Cases reported in this issue include * Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Oy - the Finnish Supreme Court decision after the European Court's preliminary ruling as to the use of Gillette's trade marks by a manufacturer of compatible razor blades; Below: from Polish hero to trade mark - the curious fate of Jan III Sobieski* Belvedere's application - an opposition before the Irish Patents Office to an application to register JAN III SOBIESKI as a trade… [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm
Co. v Gillette Co., 64 NY2d 304, 311), it is the insured's burden to establish the existence of coverage (see Lavine v Indemnity Ins. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm by Elizabeth Yin
Stardust, Gillett, and Albury explain how dating apps have shared their users’ data with law enforcement to assist with surveillance, targeted policing, and entrapment. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
  The Gillettes, Mr Joseph and two others, sued for libel. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:11 pm by Bart Torvik
So if the question is whether the Secretary of Treasury may mint a platinum coin, you have two applicable provisions: (1) the general provision that the Secretary may mint only 12 kinds of coins, none of which are platinum; and (2) the specific provision that says the Secretary may mint indeed mint a platinum coin. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:11 am by Bart Torvik
*So these decisions can be defended in terms of judicial modesty, and as consistent applications of basic interpretative principles. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:47 am by John W. Arden
The agreement stated that “[a]s permitted by applicable law, [Kia] may add new dealers to, relocate dealers into or remove dealers from the [Area of Primary Responsibility] assigned to [Glassman]. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:38 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ventura, Terrorism According to the STL's Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law: A Defining Moment or a Moment of Defining? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:31 am by Mark Summerfield
There are, however, some additional factors which set the ABILIFY case apart from the recent CRESTOR decisions – in particular the court’s discussion of the meaning of ‘exploit’ in the Patents Act 1990, its interpretation of ‘Swiss-style’ claims, and its consideration of the applicability of the so-called ‘Gillette defence’. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am by Adam Wagner
Update, 2 December 2010 – Catherine Rhind has commented on the judgment on Inforrm’s Blog: Despite branding the underlying dispute between the Motown Tribute Band “the Gillettes” and their entertainment booking service a “considerable … storm in a tea-cup”, the Supreme Court have broadened the scope and application of the defence of fair comment. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:18 am by Barbara van Schewick
  Third, Zittrain overestimates the ability of generative end devices to route around discrimination.[3]  As Bill Lehr, Marvin Sirbu, Sharon Gillett, Jon Peha have explained (pp. 637-638), this ability is ultimately limited. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
  It has its origins in the Gillette defence. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
Therefore, if Roche tried to enforce such a patent, Pfizer would have a complete Gillette defence.Would an Arrow declaration be useful? [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David Markus
  Will be an interesting trial:On Friday, the two-term mayor, surrounded by an entourage of defense lawyers and political supporters, pleaded not guilty to an indictment charging him with seeking kickbacks in exchange for sponsoring federal grant applications that prosecutors say were meant to enrich him.Even the magistrate judge, John J. [read post]