Search for: "ARMSTRONG v DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
When the Justice Department's plans were announced, the House of Representatives intervened to defend the constitutionality of the statute, and Friday the Justice Department filed its opposition. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:57 am by Josh Blackman
In June 2021, the Garland Justice Department reached a settlement with the Democratic-controlled House. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — justification needed by police officer, after he has pulled over a vehicle for a traffic violation, to go beyond minimally intrusive searching of questioning Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Ken White
My view is absolutely not limited to the Department of Justice under this administration. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Voisine first came to the Court in OT 2012, under the nom de guerre Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Miles with the Securities Division of the Department of Financial Institutions was suppressible. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am by Steven Calabresi
Justice Department adopting guideline against brining charges about the use of campaign funds to cover up sexual affairs. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
One justice preferred to decide the case under the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the three remaining justices upheld the provision under the Canadian Charter. [read post]