Search for: "ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP"
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
The transcript for the argument in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 7:32 am
Although the banks didn't seem to blink, Arthur Andersen decided to fold and settle on November 1 for $72.5 million. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:12 am
Supreme Court case, Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:45 pm
In 2001 - George Bush's first term - the Justice Department had rushed to criminally indict Arthur Andersen which destroyed the firm. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Merits briefs for the petitioner are due Monday in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 6:47 am
Edwards and against Arthur Andersen. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:45 am
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:43 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 937, the California Supreme Court set forth a broad prohibition against non-compete provisions, but it left open whether or to what extent employee non-solicit provisions were enforceable. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:57 am
Huron is a consulting company formed by former partners of Arthur Andersen, LLP which claims to help clients comply with complex regulations, resolve disputes, recover from distress, leverage technology, and stimulate growth. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 9:06 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:41 am
On April 6, 2015, the Quapaw Tribe filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the following three grounds: (1) that the Government is liable for annual educational payments of $1,000 from 1932 to the present under the Treaty of 1833; (2) that the Government is liable for $31,680.80 in unauthorized disbursements from the Quapaw Tribe’s trust accounts, as found in the 1995 Tribal Trust Funds Reconciliation Project Report prepared by Arthur Andersen LLP; and (3)… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court confirmed the viability and breadth of section 16600 and expressly rejected a line of Ninth Circuit cases which had upheld sufficiently narrow restrictive covenants that only barred a party from pursuing a small or limited part of its business. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:59 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937 [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937 [read post]
