Search for: "Abbe Gluck"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
Jesse Cross, University of South Carolina School of Law, and Abbe R. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
Gluck & Richard A. [read post]
20 May 2021, 3:30 am
Abbe R. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 7:57 pm
Gluck, Abbe R – Reading the ACA’s Findings: Textualism, Severability and the ACA’s Return to the Court, 130 Yale L.J. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Walker’s article is modeled off of important empirical work Lisa Bressman and Abbe Gluck previously conducted that studied congressional drafters’ knowledge of and use of different administrative law doctrines and interpretive tools. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:35 pm
Today's question counts only as underexplored, not unexplored (due to Abbe Gluck’s marvelous article): A federal court is interpreting a state statute. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Abbe R. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
On the New York Times Op/Ed page today, Professors Abbe Gluck and Michael Graetz express befuddlement and disappointment concerning DOJ's argument to the Court that the so-called "individual mandate" provision of the Affordable Care Act is not severable from the insurance nondiscrimination provisions of the Act, such that if the Court were to declare that the former is unconstitutional, the latter would be inoperative, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:16 am
New Article: Abbe R. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Balkin (Yale Law School), Abbe R. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:50 am
" Also in yesterday's Inquirer, law professor Abbe R. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:06 pm
Louis) Abbe Gluck (Yale University) B. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Christopher Walker Inspired by Lisa Bressman and Abbe Gluck’s pioneering empirical study on how congressional staffers approach drafting statutes, I spent months in 2013 surveying federal agency rule drafters on how they interpret statutes and draft regulations. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
Abbe R. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:55 am
Abbe R. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
The federalism argument has been made in two important Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, one submitted on behalf of 22 states and the District of Columbia, and another on behalf of four law professors – Abbe Gluck, Gillian Metzger, Thomas Merrill, and Nicholas Bagley.The federalism argument is based on the doctrine of Pennhurst State Hospital v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Abbe R. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm
That other judges are skeptical of Chevron deference is but one of the interesting findings from the survey of 42 sitting federal appellate judges conducted by Professor Abbe Gluck and former judge Richard Posner, just published in the Harvard Law Review. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
Gluck, Columbia Law School, David B. [read post]
