Search for: "Abbott v. City of Los Angeles" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:05 pm by William W. Abbott
City of Los Angeles, (2019) 32 Cal.App. 5th 1253 On June 15, 2016, the City of Los Angeles (“the City”) issued a “Specific Plan Compliance Review Density Bonus & Affordable Housing Incentives” (the “Determination”) for a mixed-use affordable housing project. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The case study is used to debate the data protection implications of a data-oriented city development. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:16 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The Los Angeles Rams (2009 [City of Industry stadium that never materialized]), Sacramento Kings (2013), Golden State Warriors (2015), and Los Angeles Clippers (2017), all received Legislature approved exemptions from the full CEQA process for construction of new stadium or arena projects, and the A’s now hope to receive the same. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Abbott v. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In Scher, Plaintiffs owned property along Henry Ridge Motorway, which is located in the unincorporated Topanga Canyon area in the Santa Monica Mountains in Los Angeles County. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]