Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In an earlier post, I considered the settlement in Carey v Independent News & Media and the status of Bloomberg v ZXC [2022] AC 1158, [2022] UKSC 5 (16 February 2022) in Ireland. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am by Eugene Volokh
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
This was because a non-exclusive licence agreement between Ford and AC Cars in 1996 stated that it was limited to vehicles manufactures in the UK, but was “without limit” as to sales and marketing territory, meaning that AC Cars could sell cars into the US, provided it carried appropriate insurance. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
 Applying the American Cyanamid [1975] AC 396 test, he turned to the first of the three limbs - is there an arguable case. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am by David Pocklington
The full document is available here and our summary is here, and reflects the leading judgment of Lord Bingham (at 21) and the comments of Lord Hope (at 49) in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The investigating body sent a confidential Letter of Request to a foreign state seeking information and documents relating to him. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The article finds settlement “inevitable” given the UK decision in Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] AC 1158 AC. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
The leading authority for legal proximity is Alcock v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police  [1992] 1 AC 310 (‘Alcock’). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Levin Papantonio
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]