Search for: "Adoptive Couple v. Cherokee Nation" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Kate Fort
The Oklahoma Supreme Court wins favorite sentence in an ICWA case of 2016: “Appellants’ [State of Oklahoma and foster mother] unlearned understanding of what is binding case law and attempts to broaden holdings of this Court, the United States Supreme Court [Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Cicely Wilson
Before Baby Girl’s birth, Biological Father, a member of the Cherokee Nation, agreed to relinquish his parental rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Baby Girl was a highly publicized dispute involving an Indian child caught in between the emotional and legal battles of the Cherokee Nation against non-Indian adoptive parents. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:57 am by David Bernstein
Yesterday, the Supreme Court held oral arguments in Brackeen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
’s father, a member of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma.[36]  Six years after the divorce, the birth mother arranged for an adoption of D.M.J. by a non-Indian married couple.[37]  Adoption proceedings began; and the birth father and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma appeared at the hearing to oppose the adoption.[38]  The trial court terminated the birth father’s parental rights for nonsupport of D.M.J.;… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
Alito moves on to his second opinion, Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 7, Jan. 14, Jan. 21 and Feb. 18 conferences) Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
It was extensively cited in Justice Thomas's concurrence in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
The case involved a First Amendment challenge to the denial of a tax exemption for a church-owned property occupied by a couple whom the church designated as its ministers. [read post]