Search for: "Agarwal v. Agarwal" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Anubha Sinha
Star TV India(plaintiff/Respondents) filed three suits against Piyush Agarwal (Cricbuzz), Idea Cellular and ONMOBILE(Appellants/Defendants). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:59 am
 The Supreme Court in Rameshkumar Agarwal Vs. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
The Supreme Court in fact concluded that there is no conflict between its decisions in the matter of  McDowell (supra),  Azadi Bachao (supra)  and Mathuram Agarwal (supra). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:12 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Rahool Agarwal, an attorney in the Toronto office of the global law firm Norton Rose, has posted a brief commentary on the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Rasouli v Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/2a93gv4 (Robert Unterberger) International eDiscovery, Sanctions, Ethics and US-UK Comparisons at Georgetown - http://tinyurl.com/25yj3gt (Chris Dale) Keyword Searches not Good Enough for eDiscovery, Experts Say - http://tinyurl.com/232mkh9 (Cindy Waxer) Lateral Moves, Court Rulings Spotlight E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/2ffcjwc (Gina Passarella) Legislators, Regulators Consider 'Do Not Track' Mechanism - http://tinyurl.com/2d28p3m (Lora Bentley) Moody v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:34 am by The Legal Blog
Mr Agarwal has sought complete files on the appointment of Justices H L Dattu, A K Gangualy and R M Lodha as Supreme Court judges superseding Justices A P Shah, A K Patnayak(at present an apex court judge) and V K Gupta. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:12 am by Durga Rao
The rule applies when i) The Statute contends an enumeration of specific words; ii) The subject of enumeration constitutes a class or category; iii) The class or category is not exhausted by the enumeration; iv) General terms follow upon the enumeration; and v) there is no indication of a different legislative intent. [read post]