Search for: "Al Haramain Islamic Foundation"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 12:40 pm
Court Says Bush Illegally Wiretapped Two American Lawyers :: Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
The allegations were initially based on a classified document the government accidentally mailed to the former Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation lawyers. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:21 pm
But even if the government did illegally wiretap him, and accidentally provided him with documentary evidence proving it, Tooley would wind up in the same boat as the American lawyers who represented the defunct al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:03 pm
This last point caught the eye of the California lawyers for Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc., Wendell Belew, and Asim Ghafoor. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:57 pm
The lawyers say the rulings are important to the California case - Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation vs. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
argues that Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation does not have standing even though everyone knows that the document proves that Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation does have standing. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
The allegations were based on classified documents the government accidentally mailed to the two former lawyers of an Oregon chapter of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
” Eisenberg is the plaintiff attorney in Al-Haramain v Bush, which accuses the Bush administration of violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by illegally wiretapping the director and two lawyers for the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation without a warrant. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:46 am
The allegations were based on classified documents the government accidentally mailed to the two former lawyers of an Oregon chapter of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:43 pm
That case, concerning the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation attorneys, is pending. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:43 am
[JURIST] The Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation [JURIST news archive] on Wednesday filed [motion, PDF] a request for partial summary judgment [FRCP 56 text] concluding that the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website] illegally wiretapped several conversations between the charity and its lawyers. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:37 pm
The allegations were based on classified documents the government accidentally mailed to the former Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation lawyers. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693) and those brought… [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:05 am
The filing came in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al., v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:13 pm
The San Francisco lawsuit began when the government accidentally sent the plaintiffs documents that showed their overseas communications with Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation officials were intercepted without warrants. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:00 am
Walker, bringing to a head months of volleying between the government, the plaintiffs and himself, ordered Justice Department lawyers to explain why he should not essentially enter a default judgment against the government for violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by spying on the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:04 pm
The San Francisco case began when the government accidentally sent the plaintiffs documents that showed their overseas communications with Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation officials were intercepted without warrants. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:25 pm
That's because the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation material likely remains locked under the control of the Obama administration's Litigation Security Section of the Justice Department, according to the record in the case. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon: Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc., with introductory note by Bruce Zagaris House of Lords: EM (Lebanon) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:50 am
In the warrantless-wiretapping case al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, the Obama administration defended the assertions of the Bush Administration claiming the court should dismiss the case outright. [read post]
