Search for: "Alameda v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Last week, however, in Moeller v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 802.) [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Second Amendment may invalidate ban on opening new gun stores in a California county
16 May 2016, 9:18 am
Though D.C. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Superior Court of Alameda County, No. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:35 am
Cnty. of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 717 (1973) (explaining that “a State is not a ‘citizen’ for purposes of the diversity jurisdiction”).Slip op., at 9. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:35 pm
Boatworks, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:38 pm
County of Alameda, 223 Cal. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Interestingly, in its introduction, the Court stated: "We hold the provision is unconscionable and unenforceable under Armendariz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
State, 50 Tenn. 165, 178 (1871). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Superior Court of Alameda County, No. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
” Iskanian v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
This case is the logical follow-on to another Rivers and Harbors case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:32 pm
In Fitzsimons v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm
Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:52 am
Crestwood Behavioral Health v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:07 pm
The case of Texiera v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:18 am
County of Alameda, which resulted in a significant damages award for a temporary regulatory taking, and could signal an important judicial shift in the state toward the increased use of takings law to reign in government regulations. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm
County of Alameda(2012) ___ Cal.4th ____, 2012 WL 2145906. [read post]
