Search for: "Alaska State Fair, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
State Dept. of Corrections, 53 P.3d 1115, 1124 n.38 (Alaska 2002); Laznovsky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., the owner of the copyright for the song, brought an action against Luther Campbell, the leader of the band 2 Live Crew, for copyright infringement. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by HowardGutman
(“Settlement Class Vehicles”), and you purchased your vehicle in the continental United States, including Alaska and Hawaii. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:10 pm
Carpeneti at the Alaska Supreme Court from 2000 to 2001.Mary E. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:13 am by Ray Mullman
Only three states - Alaska, Arizona and Montana - require regular disclosure of corporate shareholders in some form, according to the 2009 report by the National Association of Secretaries of State. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Holland & Hart
(The Ninth Circuit’s rulings apply to Montana, California, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Arizona, Alaska, and Hawaii.) [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
State Net Operating Loss (NOL)  Provisions As of July 1, 2021   Federal Conformity State Defined Carryforward Years State Defined Carryforward Caps Alabama   15   Alaska Yes     Arizona   20   Arkansas   8   California   0 $0 Colorado Yes     Connecticut   20   Delaware Yes     Florida Yes     Georgia Yes     Hawaii Yes     Idaho   20… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
Maybe if Fox distributed a video game that depicted a famous baseball player who was domiciled in Alaska when he died, and was careful to avoid distributing it in Alaska,[20] the Dormant Commerce Clause might forbid subjecting Fox to Alaska law.[21] But when a company distributes material into a state, including online, applying state tort law to that material likely doesn't violate the Clause.[22] And though it may be expensive to comply with the… [read post]
The Alaska Supreme Court has explained The basic element of the doctrine of vagueness is a requirement of fair notice. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven statesAlaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
[FLOOR] (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]