Search for: "Alexander v. Drug Enforcement Administration"
Results 41 - 44
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Alexander, No. 07-3219 Denials of a motion to suppress evidence underlying defendant's plea of guilty to drug-related charges, as well as a motion to compel discovery of certain materials, are affirmed over claims that: 1) an officer had no basis for subjecting a package to extra scrutiny at an airport mail facility; 2) although concededly the package would inevitably have been discovered, defendant's alleged beating at the hands of an officer should preclude application… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Federal pre-emption cases, like those last week, often bucked that trend, however.In Riegel v Medtronic, issued that day, medical manufacturers, backed by the Bush administration, asked the court to find that medical devices approved by the Food & Drug Administration should be immune from state law tort actions. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The obvious danger from such claims is the effect on a jury when the plaintiff's counsel stands up and accuses your client of breaking the law - not just any law but the law overseen by the omniscient Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"); the law intended by Congress to keep us safe from adulterated drugs and misbranded medical devices. [read post]
