Search for: "Alliance Leasing LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Issue:   Whether plaintiffs, an agnostic couple and their son and a lesbian couple and their son, have Article III standing to bring an Establishment Clause challenge to City leases of recreational facilities to the Boy Scouts. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by centerforartlaw
The Tamara de Lempicka Estate LLC has firmly maintained Tamara de Lempicka’s copyright, and this article will explore the power of that copyright. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Another appeal in an action filed by another group (represented by the same attorneys at trial and on appeal as appellants and making the same unsuccessful CEQA challenges to another ministerially issued VESCO vineyard permit) awaits oral argument before a different panel of the First District (Division 3) on July 12, 2017 (Watertrough Children’s Alliance v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Underscoring the importance of the issue, 24 briefs have been filed by an array of amici, from law enforcementofficials to California Governor Gavin Newsom to the homeless advocates the LA Alliance for Human Rights. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
Fox News Network LLC). $350K awarded to sergeant transferred 180 miles away after reporting sexual harassment. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
That appeal was dismissed Monday after both sides reached a compromise that, in part, calls for the BLM to consider impacts to cultural, wildlife and other resources when reviewing new lease sales. [read post]
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]