Search for: "Ally V. Young" Results 41 - 60 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 4:50 am by SHG
Hope that helps. https://t.co/2tzPyRQbQR — Cathy Young (@CathyYoung63) March 19, 2022 There is no right to speak one’s mind “without fear of being shamed or shunned. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
See Allie Humphreys, Note, Has Blue Overshadowed Green? [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It's only human nature for people to think the worst of their adversaries' views—including by labeling them hate speech or fake news or incitement—while giving their allies the benefit of the doubt. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am by Alexander Vindman
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Judgment in Leyonhjelm v Hanson-Young [2021] FCAFC 22 was handed down on 3 March. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am by Almudena Azcárate Ortega
Section 6 – Emergency Assistance  The Artemis Accords echo the language of not just the Outer Space Treaty, and particularly Article V, but also the 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (known as the Rescue and Return Agreement), which in Article II stipulates that states must take all possible steps to rescue the personnel of a spacecraft and render all necessary assistance. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]