Search for: "AmBase Corp."
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
"Plaintiff has stated a cause of action for legal malpractice by alleging that "but for" defendant's failure to prepare and procure documents necessary to provide him with a first-priority security interest, he would have been able to recover the amounts owed to him by the defaulting borrower (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:15 am
Corp., 300 AD2d 393 [2002]). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they would have succeeded in the underlying personal injury action "but for" defendants' conduct (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434, 866 N.E.2d 1033, 834 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2007]). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
NY Court: Davis Polk Did Not Commit Malpractice in Tax Court Case, May Keep 50% "Success Fee" Kicker
27 Apr 2007, 12:00 pm
The New York Court of Appeals yesterday unanimously ruled that Davis Polk Wardwell did not commit legal malpractice in its successful handling of a federal tax case for AmBase Corp and was entitled to its $1.4 million fee, which included... [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:10 am
This case, in which DP represented AmBase Corp. involved litigation in a tax matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:39 am
High Court: Davis Polk Didn't Commit Malpractice, Is Entitled to Fee
New York Law Journal
Davis Polk & Wardwell did not commit legal malpractice in its handling -- ultimately successful -- of a long-standing federal tax case for the AmBase Corp. and is entitled to a fee of more than $1.4 million, the New York Court of Appeals ruled unanimously Thursday. [read post]
