Search for: "Amaral"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
“What the Oral Argument Should Have Said”: You can access the new episode of law professor Akhil Reed Amar‘s podcast, “Amarica’s Constitution,” via this link. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:32 am
Compartieron su historia de complicidad y amor a la justicia. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:38 am
Also online there, law professor Vikram David Amar has an essay titled “The Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The value of Professor Amar’s article was to show how landmark cases built on the principle and how it could generate further insights.Yet Professor Amar recognized that one can take intratextualism too far. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court’s manipulation of the meaning of Section Three can’t address the basic reality that states can (and ultimately will) do whatever they want as long as we have an electoral college model for picking Presidents, something on which our originalist Constitution is (for better or worse) quite clear.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is a [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Akhil Amar went justice by justice to explain why it was credible for each one to side with him, in an especially detailed and vivid example of Supreme Court fan fiction. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
It is fair enough to cite Akhil Amar here, but Mitchell has to realize Amar thinks his position is a "gimmick" or worse. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rather, Mitchell's "President is not an officer of the United States" gambit relies on a hyper-formalistic version of what Professor Akhil Amar has called intra-textualism that renders the Constitution a kind of secret decoder ring. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:41 am
Amar Gandhi, a sheriff’s office spokesman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Akhil Amar & Vikram Amar.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
The Amar brothers think that our current setup of having legislative officers in the line of succession to the presidency is unconstitutional as they argued in print in Akhil Reed Amar & Vikram David Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution (1/27/24). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:43 pm
Amar Gandhi, spokesperson for the sheriff’s office. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:04 am
“The Supreme Court Should Get Out of the Insurrection Business”: Law professor Akhil Reed Amar has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
The article quotes, among others, Akhil Amar, Mike Luttig, and Will Baude. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:14 pm
Now, with Monitor Plus, we’ll help people take back their exposed data from data broker sites that are trying to sell it,” said Tony Amaral-Cinotto, Product Manager of Mozilla Monitor at Mozilla. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
[Note: This is the fifth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
