Search for: "Amendment To Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
(Amended opinion) U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 07, 2008 Urcinoli v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors, mostly… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm
She also claims the coaches pulled her scholarship, but later reinstated it.The university claims it followed all Title IX procedures as required, without giving details. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:56 am
Florida that life without parole for juveniles was unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 6:50 pm
Lawyers for Death Row inmates, armed with evidence of botched executions in states such as Ohio and Florida, have flooded courts around the country with legal challenges in the past few years. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Florida, 14-7505, a capital case involving the murder of the manager of a Florida Popeyes restaurant, asks two questions: (1) whether a penalty-phase jury has a constitutional obligation to render a verdict on whether the defendant is intellectually disabled when evidence has been presented to support such a conclusion; and (2) whether Ring v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, 732 (8th Cir. 2008): 1) plaintiff was likely to prove any interest the state has in protecting funeral mourners from unwanted speech was outweighed by the First Amendment right to free speech; [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:10 am
The rule is procedural, not jurisdictional. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
By way of background, I have studied and written about federal sentencing for more than fifteen years, including time spent as a federal judicial clerk, a litigator in private practice, and a faculty member at Marquette Law School, where I teach Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Sentencing, and related courses. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
Florida (2010) 560 U.S. __ , 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825.) [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:46 am
Florida, in which the Supreme Court held that sentencing juvenile non-homicide offenders to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole ("LWOP") violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments, by virtue of gross disproportionality between crime and punishment. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
This morning the court hears oral argument in two criminal-procedure cases. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Anderson Merchandisers, LLC 15-492Issue: (1) Whether, when a district court dismisses a complaint without leave to amend, a subsequent motion for leave to amend should be judged by ordinary Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) standards (as the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits have held), or whether a post-judgment motion seeking leave to amend is a “disfavored” motion that the court has “considerable discretion… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
” After issuing decisions, the justices heard oral arguments in two criminal-procedure cases. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
One defendant's sentence is remanded for resentencing where the district court committed prejudicial procedural error by calculating his advisory guideline range incorrectly. [read post]
