Search for: "American Advertising Co. v. STATE, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Finally, on this most American of holidays, we cannot ignore the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Farias v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Ashley: text (not short quippy phrases, but narrative describing/advertising the product) can be copyrighted, as long as it’s more than the standard list of product ingredients, cautions, etc. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:38 pm
The American version of this knowledge-based “distributor” liability is commonly associated with the US Supreme Court’s 1959 decision in Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
Shikada v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
From the beginning, it was a priority to be ad-free and noncommercial, not under the control of advertisers. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
We analyzed 120 companies: food/beverage, entertainment, etc. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
We keep these tables, etc in the garage at the law office. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
American Airlines, No. 071386 (2nd Cir. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
And because she has not denied her services to anyone based on their race, creed, sexual orientation, etc., she has not done anything that could be deemed a violation of the CADA. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
In FEC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Sponsors for the Clippers pulled their names from the Staples Center and suspended advertisements (including CarMax, State Farm, and Kia Motors among others), the team itself protested at the beginning of the first playoff game by wearing their warm-up jerseys inside-out, and black socks during the game, the NAACP preemptively revoked Mr. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Mike Grynberg: we care most about trade dress, it seems, as well as problems of the multifactor test etc. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm
In Baron v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am
Belmont Report—flagship of American regulation. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
