Search for: "American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. State of Illinois"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, noting that “[w]hile the current case applies only to state employees, the repercussions could affect unions nationwide. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published.] [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:53 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment; he suggests that “the possibility of other, unintended consequences” from a ruling against the union “is beginning to excite some union advocates and… [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, “threatens the financial foundation of public employee unions in 22 ‘blue’ states” and “is being closely watched for its… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that “[p]ublic sector unions have been, and continue to be, a critical pathway to the middle class for women and people of color” and that “[a]… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, Justice Neil Gorsuch will give “a fair hearing” to the arguments in “a brief from two libertarian legal scholars, alongside a brief submitted by a… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whetheran Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, a case that could well end laws in 22 states that require public employees to pay “agency fees” to a union regardless of whether they are members of the union or wish to support it. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 may prove to be telling. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 presents a First Amendment challenge to all Illinois public-sector labor-relations statutes and all Illinois government labor contracts that require union-represented employees to pay a fee to the union for services that the union is required by law to provide. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), takes the opposite position from DOJ’s amicus brief filed two years earlier, in Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (14-915), to argue that it is time to overturn Abood v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 31. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, noting that “even if Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whetheran Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that “everything public employee unions do is inherently political—which is all the more reason to allow non-consenting employees… [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that the case “finally provides the Court with a golden opportunity to restore the First Amendment liberties of the country’s public-sector workers. [read post]
