Search for: "Ames v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Right, I am back from a two week holiday (it was lovely thank you) so onwards… Crescent Trustees Limited v Behjat. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Superior Court, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a non-resident defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction in a state in virtue of having been served with process while physically present within the state, even apart from any other contacts the defendant has or doesn't have with the forum state. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
The court in Ogilvie thus affirmed the continued relevance of vocational evidence with respect to the determination of permanent disability. ( Applied Materials v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Bush (2004), which gave Guantanamo prisoners the right to challenge their detention in federal court, and in Munaf v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
This post is a detour from my series on section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Superior Court of Justice and Court of Appeal Working Families decisions (see here and here (SCJ) and here (ONCA)). [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
TINA specifically prohibits a contractor from claiming the Government’s price would not have decreased because the procurement was sole source or the contractor otherwise had superior bargaining power.[16] A contractor also cannot claim the Contracting Officer should have known the data were defective even though the contractor took no affirmative action to inform the Contracting Officer the data were defective.[17] A contractor cannot claim the price would not change because the… [read post]