Search for: "Ames v. The People Of The State Of New York"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
The Good New and the Bad NewsThe only good news for the Canadian educational community about the recent Federal Court decision in Access Copyright v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
[New York Criminal Procedure Law] §§ 100.40, 100.15; People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
New York is blessed with perhaps the strongest state judiciary in the nation. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:41 pm
As I explained in a previous blog, the practice of officers prosecuting the New York traffic tickets they issue was upheld by the New York Court of Appeals case; People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:34 pm
Last month, the Eastern District of New York ruled for the state. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
” Meanwhile, I’ve been advised by family who still live in New York to reassure all of you New York Giants fans that the star I wear does not mean that I play for the Dallas Cowboys. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
I am copying the landmark case below that eliminated all jurisdictional restraints on the courts of the Southern District of New York from declaring and returning property stolen from Jews:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.BERNSTEINv.N. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
In a long-awaited decision about whether Happy the Elephant could be designated a person for the purposes of a writ of habeas corpus, the Court of Appeals of the State of New York has spoken. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
In a long-awaited decision about whether Happy the Elephant could be designated a person for the purposes of a writ of habeas corpus, the Court of Appeals of the State of New York has spoken. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
Here we come to the first important limitation in New York’s statute: it only applies to people “domiciled in this state at the time of death. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
§25 applied at all in this day and age, it should be applied only to marriages performed within the State of New York. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Court of Appeals of New York 2014). [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
" Judge Cardozo famously rejected the federal exclusionary rule for New York courts in People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
I am confident that treating identical crimes, one committed by someone who is already here, one by someone who proposes to move to New York, are treated differently is the basis of my claim that equal protection, and a citizen's right to move about the country, are violated by New York's SORA statute. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
Yesterday, in People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
