Search for: "Andrews v. Police Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Bray v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 3:57 am
Inter-American Court of Human RightsBaraona Bray v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Charlene Cantrell Koonce, Andrew C. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
As mentioned above, on 26 July 2023 the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) dismissed the appeal in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 17 July 2023 Nicklin J, sitting at the Port Talbot Justice Centre, heard the case of Corey Lee Styles v South Wales Police [2023] EWHC 1835 (KB). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
In this case, the claimant, Andrew Carnegie, was injured at work by a female coworker with whom he had been romantically involved. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
The Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police found no information to indicate criminal offences had been committed. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 3 July 2023, the libel trial in Harcombe & Kendrick v Associated Newspapers Ltd began before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In a per curiam opinion joined by Judges Henderson, Pillard, and Pan, the Court in Intellistop, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
In City of Coral Springs Police Officers’ Pension Plan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
In City of Coral Springs Police Officers’ Pension Plan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Andrew Baker J has remitted the decision to the governor. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
”[35] For the court, the question of whether NFTs are securities or not was of no consequence: the DOJ did not actually charge him with insider trading as defined under securities law.[36] In contrast to section 10(b) insider trading claim which requires fraud “in connection with the purchase or sale of any security,” section 1343 provides flexibility as it is not limited to securities or commodities.[37] Therefore, the court ruled that whether the “insider… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
Little and Andrew Rosen. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm
Four years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Nieves v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
A costs hearing is set to take place on Tuesday On 9 June 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Styles v South Wales Police. [read post]
