Search for: "Angell v. Angell" Results 41 - 60 of 8,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 10:30 am by Dave Maass
What: Oral Arguments in American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California et al .v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:00 am
Now, in a stipulated permanent injunction in Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
Los Angeles - Mag Instrument, the owners of a family of trademarks including "Mag-Lite", has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Larson Electronics in federal court this week. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
Los Angeles - Mag Instrument, the owners of a family of trademarks including "Mag-Lite", has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Larson Electronics in federal court this week. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
Los Angeles - Mag Instrument, the owners of a family of trademarks including "Mag-Lite", has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Larson Electronics in federal court this week. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 2:37 pm by Bill Marler
  Owner Ivan Vásquez told the Los Angeles Times that nine of the restaurant’s 52 employees — including three cooks, a prep cook, and a dishwasher — tested positive for Salmonella. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:41 am by snahmod
On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:23 am
Angel & Co (a firm) v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth (a firm) [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 9 “When ordering summary enforcement of undertakings given by solicitors to redeem or discharge existing mortgages and charges over property being sold, the court was not required to conduct an inquiry to examine what would have happened [...] [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm
  Predictably, Los Angeles files suit, and six years of expensive litigation follow.Los Angeles wins the latest round. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:45 am by Melanie Notari and Elizabeth G. Litten
The timing of the Planned Parenthood Los Angeles incident and the legal and political spotlight on Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:27 pm
In its Complaint, it denies that Respondent owns any legitimate trademark rights in any ANGELS mark. [read post]