Search for: "Anthony A. May v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
A party may not take advantage of an error that he commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of his own neglect or misconduct. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Indiana: The question before the Court is whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause is incorporated against the states under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am by Amy Howe
Dreeben (Art Lien) Justice Elena Kagan brought up United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Likewise the State may not seek to remove a popular but disfavored product from the marketplace by prohibiting truthful, nonmisleading advertisements that contain impressive endorsements or catchy jingles. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Derek Muller
Such concerns featured prominently in Justice Anthony Kennedy’s solo opinion in the 2004 decision Vieth v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
To what extent may a state’s cutback in voting convenience such as more limited early voting be a Voting Rights Act violation when other states have never offered the convenience in the first place? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy late last month. [read post]