Search for: "Anthony Lanham"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
The magistrate judge, Thomas Rawles Jones Jr., as well as District Judge Anthony J. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:46 am
When Justice Anthony Kennedy characterized his position as being that the “First Amendment protects absolutely outrageous speech insofar as trademarks are concerned,” Connell agreed that the statement was “correct. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
(relisted after the Oct. 28 conference) Returning Relists Anthony v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
Justice Samuel Alito wrote the dissent in Walker (joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Anthony Kennedy) and the majority opinion in Tam. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:11 am
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
Some of us have been following the Novak case as an important free speech case after Anthony Novak was prosecuted for a parody on Facebook to mock the police department in Parma, Ohio. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
For example, the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registration of immoral or scandalous marks will probably also fail constitutional scrutiny. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion took more of a Gordian knot approach. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
This is the big fight over the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause and its effect on the Asian-American rock band called The Slants. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
’” In sum, today’s decision declaring the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause unconstitutional reaffirms the First Am [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
First up is Justice Anthony M. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
Breyer; but a concurring opinion by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Stephen Grant Meyer, As Long as They Don’t Move Next Door: Segregation and Racial Conflict in American Neighborhoods (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:15 pm
Section 43(A) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy explained in his concurrence that “the central purpose of trademark registration is to facilitate source identification… Whether a mark is disparaging bears no plausible relation to that goal. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Commissioner Cohn noted that the letter invokes Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm
Bella No More Last week, on July 19th, the Southern District of New York put the pedal to the Lanham Act metal in in Coach v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm
Predictably enough, Justice Ginsburg asked him why the Patent Act provision on fees should be interpreted differently from the identically worded Lanham Act provision – referring to the Noxell Corp. v. [read post]
