Search for: "Anthony williams v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
State of Indiana, a 12-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Robb writes:We conclude sufficient evidence exists to support Matthew's conviction. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Form, Function, and Fiduciary Law Timothy Morris, Professor and Director, Clifford Chance Centre for the Management of Professional Service Firms, Said Business School, University of Oxford, Navigating the Process of Innovation in Professional Service Firms William Henderson, Professor, Indiana University School of Law, Are We Selling Results or Resumes? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
The states she named were Alabama, California, Florida, Indiana and Missouri. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]