Search for: "Appeal of Miner" Results 41 - 60 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 12:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia requesting that the SEC’s rule be set aside in whole or in part. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Steven Chadwick
Noon timely appealed the decision of the lower court to the Seventh District Court of Appeals. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
As noted in this blog, Leonard Street's Steve Quinlivan writes: We previously noted that the challenge to the SEC's conflict minerals rules was transferred from the Court of Appeals to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 1:40 pm by Aimee Hess
Recently, the Texas Court of Appeals decided a case that demonstrates the confusion that occurs when the language in the deed is not clear. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 1:40 pm by Aimee Hess
Recently, the Texas Court of Appeals decided a case that demonstrates the confusion that occurs when the language in the deed is not clear. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:02 pm by Marcia L. Narine
Last week the DC Circuit Court of Appeals generally upheld the Dodd-Frank conflict minerals rule but found that the law violated the First Amendment to the extent that it requires companies to report to the SEC and state on their... [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 4:56 am by Jeff Werbitt
As reported by this WSJ blog, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit is currently rehearing the question of whether the conflict minerals rules violate the First Amendment – to the extent that they require a company to report that its products “have not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Daniel M. Bauer
Bauer We reported previously on the ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit striking down the part of the SEC’s conflict minerals rules that requires a registrant to describe its products as not “DRC conflict free” and upholding the remainder of the conflict minerals rules. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm
  Construing the ambiguity in favor of the grantor, the Court of Appeal found that "minerals" included gravels on the record before it. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:15 am by Broc Romanek
Below is news from Hunton & Williams’ Scott Kimpel (also see this Cooley blog): Yesterday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals finally issued its opinion on rehearing in NAM v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:46 am by Charles Sartain
On appeal Bauer and BM2 challenged the court’s jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:29 pm
In January of this year, the MSHA proposed several new mine safety regulations, including stopping mining companies from using appeals of safety regulation citations to avoid tougher sanctions. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am by David Lynn
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the appeal of National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 7:56 am
GJ Sentinel The Colorado Court of Appeals is considering a lawsuit questioning whether the state owns mineral rights beneath land it condemned for construction of Interstate 70 east of Rifle. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
On appeal, Farm & Ranch argued that the recorded deed restrictions were effective to reserve the minerals, and the “subject to” provision placed the grantees on notice. [read post]