Search for: "Appeal of Murray, et al" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
Conrad Murray was hired to care for MJ and make sure he was present and alert for preparations MJ died after Murray administered lethal dose of anesthetic propofol (which was intended to help MJ sleep) Civil Suit (Katherine Jackson et al v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:00 am by Administrator
Quoi qu’en pense Murray-Hall, Le Journal de Mourréal prête à confusion avec Le Journal de Montréal et contrevient ainsi à l’article 20(1)a) de la LMC. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Cohen et al. eds., 2003).This paper presents important empirical results on the extent to which patents impede follow-on research. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 2:55 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Curran, et al., Analysis of the Uniqueness and Persistence of Human Scent, 7 Forensic Sci. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:35 am by Ben
Both the DMCA and the 1972 Copyright Act (which the DMCA amended) are federal laws because they emanate from Congress – the safe harbour principle is a creation of federal law.At stake in this case was whether pre-1972 sound recordings are covered under the safe harbour rule, since pre-1972 sound recordings are protected under state law rather than federal law.Capitol Records et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
District Court for the Southern District of California, Hammock et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Flatiron et al[vii]. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has an article on the appeal decision here. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Hansmann, et al., The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective [Feb. 2005]). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
  We especially like defense counsel's argument on rebuttal that the government's policy of advocating guideline sentences in every case (other than cooperator cases) makes their arguments essentially meaningless in any individual case - not to mention anachronistic in light of Booker et al. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
" Interestingly, Barbour et al. apparently did not file a reply brief. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am by INFORRM
The case arose when a photographer from Big Pictures Limited took the picture of Dr Neil and Joanne Murray’s son, David Murray without their consent. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]