Search for: "Application of Conde"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
More Adventures In Ethics: Did David Boies Cross Any Ethical Lines In His Work For Harvey Weinstein?
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
Another legal ethics issue in the headlines! [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:44 pm
Conde Nast (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), provided some additional clarity on contractual well-worded venue provisions and claims in a lawsuit. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:51 am
As always, it is best to be cognizant of each applicable state law and craft employment agreements accordingly. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:51 am
As always, it is best to be cognizant of each applicable state law and craft employment agreements accordingly. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:54 am
Due to an increase in trade mark applications, the IPO identified the need to forecast future trade mark applications to plan resource allocations. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
That this is undertaken in a socialist society the core object of which remain old fashioned European Soviet class struggle produces an irony that is both tragic and telling for the state of the social and political organization of Cuba and the membrane that exists—on the Cuban side—between its theories of social class (applicable it appears when Cubans interact with each other) and the practice of social classthat is performed at the doorways of every hotel and high… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm
Cond 1-120 (see also Model Rule 8.4(a) to the same effect). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:46 pm
Cond. 7.1(b).In Virginia, speeding at eighty miles an hour or higher, or by at least twenty miles an hour over the speed limit constitutes reckless driving, which is a Class 1 misdemeanor carrying up to a year in jail, up to six months of suspended driving (allowing an application for restricted driving privileges), and a fine up to $2,500.00. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
Last week in the Courts On 12 December 2016 there was a strike out application in the case of Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers before HHJ Moloney QC. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
Internkat and INTA internship applications open. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:08 am
The deadline for applications is 18th September.Future InternKats (!) [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:15 am
In In re Conde-Vidal, (1st Cir., April 7, 2016), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals repudiated the holding by a federal district court in Puerto Rico (see prior posting) that the Supreme Court's Obergefell marriage equality decision does not bind Puerto Rico. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
Cond. 7.1(b). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
The conviction of Condé Nast Publications Limited for contempt of court has highlighted issues which need to be noted by journalists, argues HoldTheFrontPage. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:59 pm
The metrics used in advertising and marketing in the form of eyeballs, visuals, and traffic may not be applicable to measuring return on investment. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:28 am
The court also cited the inherent risk to the plaintiffs given the ongoing uncertainty within the Second Circuit as to the applicable legal test to use in deciding whether an intern is an employee under the FLSA. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:48 am
Question 2 22405 Title 40 S.262.11(a) – 1.2.1.1 Cond Exempt Small Qty Generators 1.2.1.1 Cond Exempt Small Qty Generators: Has the facility correctly determined whether any of the solid wastes generated by the facility are hazardous wastes or acute hazardous wastes by first determining if the waste is excluded from regulation under 40 CFR 261.4? [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
As to the involved goods and services, the Board found helpful its decision in The Conde Nast Publications Inc. v. [read post]
