Search for: "Application of Prudential Securities Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  The issues in the appeal were complicated and included questions regarding the time of accrual of the barratry claim and a disagreement over the applicable limitations period, the distinction between void and voidable contract, the interplay of the attorney disciplinary system with the civil justice system, and the ramifications of the rescission remedy for the litigant seeking it. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  The issues in the appeal were complicated and included questions regarding the time of accrual of the barratry claim and a disagreement over the applicable limitations period, the distinction between void and voidable contract, the interplay of the attorney disciplinary system with the civil justice system, and the ramifications of the rescission remedy for the litigant seeking it. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Securities and Exchange Commission 12-1118Issue: Whether, to satisfy the “substantial assistance” requirement of Section 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act, which authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to bring civil aiding-and-abetting claims, the SEC must allege and prove that the defendant’s conduct was a proximate cause of the primary violation. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Gregory Dell
In Denise Hodges V Prudential Insurance Company of America & Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (Horizon), the plaintiff Denise Hodges alleged that Prudential had contravened the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by failing to pay disability benefits to her. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
The purchase price was to consist solely of buyer’s assumption of a note (and security documents) on the property, and the $500,000 deposit was to be refunded at closing. [read post]
Of particular note, in December, the Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) adopted new proxy disclosure rules that likely will be a focal point for public company directors, as the new rules relate to disclosures regarding the composition and operation of boards of directors. [1] This memorandum is an update of our client alert covering considerations for public company directors in the current environment issued on October 15, 2009. 1. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
  So we decided to take an in-depth look at all of the the precedent that rejects application of a “fraud on the market” reliance presumption to state-law claims.Just to make sure that everyone’s with us, briefly “fraud on the market” is a doctrine that waters down fraud (and, plaintiffs would like to say, other liability theories based on claimed misinformation) by presuming reliance in certain limited circumstances. [read post]