Search for: "Application of Tate"
Results 41 - 60
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am
On Wednesday 26th and Thursday 27th October, the court will hear the case In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), on appeal from [2020] NICA 26. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:34 am
The Committee on Oversight and Reform and the Committee on Homeland Security are requesting information from Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves on how the government plans to spend approximately $10 billion in federal funds to fix the state’s water infrastructure. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
Mail-order retailers, for instance, have to comply with the often byzantine tax rules of many states, even though "[s]tate taxes differ, not only in the rate imposed but also in the categories of goods that are taxed and, sometimes, the relevant date of purchase. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:56 am
When a religious objector is thus seeking a religious exemption from a specific application of the law, the judiciary would ensure that the government has demonstrated (with evidence and not mere say so) a need to interfere with religious exercise. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 11:10 am
However, the court the extra activity insufficient under Alice: A claim does not pass muster at step two by “[s]tating an abstract idea while adding the words ‘apply it with a computer.'” Slip Op. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
Sincerely, 1 David Fahrenthold, Troy Olson, and Julie Tate, 76 Fake Charities Shared a Mailbox. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
United Kingdom, the court had judged that “[s]tates may possess particular rights … by virtue of bilateral agreements or local custom … [and] that the Articles [of UNCLOS] were not intended to interfere with such [local custom or tradition-based historic] rights. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The Court presented PennEast as a watershed, breaking with the previous narrow application of structural waiver to bankruptcy powers only in Katz and establishing a definitive test for when structural waiver is applicable. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am
Citing to the firm’s tax filings and prior admissions from Capizzi in a FAFSA application that he was a 20% partner, the Court held that Capizzi possessed a 20% equity interest in the Disputed Files, not a 33.33% interest. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
AIC Ltd v Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria [2022] UKSC 16 This is a permission to appeal the decision of [2020] EWCA Civ 1585, hoping to clarify the correct approach to an application to reconsider an order after it has been made, but before it has been sealed. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
Thus, if a "generally applicable law" is "directed" at a plaintiff "because of what his speech communicated"—that is, the communication violates the statute "because of the offensive content of his particular message," then that law directly burdens plaintiff's speech…. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:07 am
In my most recent visit to London in October 2021, I was fortunate to be able to visit the Tate Britain museum. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
The second judgment being handed down is R (on the application of Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] UKSC 11, on appeal from [2020] EWCA 723. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 1:45 pm
Second, "[s]tates may regulate professional conduct, even though that conduct incidentally involves speech. [read post]
