Search for: "Arm v. State Bar (1990)" Results 41 - 60 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” The foremost example of this disfavor in the justice’s mind was the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am by Eugene Volokh
DM-71 (1991) (concluding such a lease condition is barred by state law).}Illinois allows firearms in public housing, but bans stun guns. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
So the California Supreme Court’s 2004 decision (Gates v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:38 pm by Kit Walsh
The government's reasoning stemmed from an interpretation of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which gave the government authority to restrict the export of technologies with potential military applications. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The federal civil rights statute barring discrimination in public accommodations does not forbid sex discrimination, although many state and local provisions do. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
King (Nov. 9): Whether a final judgment in favor of the United States in a lawsuit brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act bars a claim against a government employee based on Bivens v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Under federal law, a military judge “shall be a commissioned officer of the armed forces who is a member of the bar of a Federal court or a member of the bar of the highest court of a State and who is certified to be qualified for duty as a military judge by the Judge Advocate General of the armed force of which such military judge is a member. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:05 am
He enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 1986 and was discharged from active duty in 1990. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 565 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1990)....................2 Harbison v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:39 pm by John Floyd
In 1990, the Supreme Court again entered the Confrontation Clause waters with Maryland v. [read post]