Search for: "Arnold v. Board of Accountancy"
Results 41 - 60
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
If the COLOURBLIND case (Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd, Case T-257/11) had been a movie, it would have secured a nomination for its intricate screenplay, in the spirit of the recent Academy Awards. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
UKIPO says no but EUIPO Board of Appeal says yesDanny Boy Label’s TITANIC registrations O/050/21 (UKIPO, January 2021) and R0109-2020-1 (EUIPO Board of Appeal, November 2020)Just how much use is enough to prove genuine use? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
It involved absorbing and taking account of a very significant amount of evidence in what was a very hard fought case. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
The esteemed speakers included Klaus Grabinski of the German Federal Court of Justice, Ursula Kinkeldey, former Permanent Member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO, Stefan Luginbühl, International Legal Affairs with the EPO and expert on the Unitary Patent Package, and, guess who? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
Federal Circuit Applies Analogous Art Test to Exclude Prior Art References from Obviousness Analysis
6 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Practice Tip: Curiously, this opinion does not address the KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
That was a matter which the Judge was properly entitled to take into account. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Arnold. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Arnold. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
In Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
SkyKick says they are invalid, and Arnold J has asked the CJEU to opine. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
So it is worth ensuring consistency of approach across the board in this respect. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
“In its takeover jurisprudence, Delaware has balanced the competing claims of authority and accountability by varying the standard of review according to the likelihood that the actions of the board or managers will be tainted by conflicted interests in a particular transactional setting and the likelihood that non-legal forces can effectively constrain those conflicted interests in that setting. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm
Johnson created an irrevocable trust in 2018 and gathered legal representation, an art accountant, and board of directors. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
The Board of Appeal also took into account that the goods were “typically offered as gifts”. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Powerful political actors had done well placing the pieces on the board. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
