Search for: "Arthur Andersen"
Results 41 - 60
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), any contract in restra [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, ruled that a provision in an employment agreement that prevented an employee from competing with his former employer following the termination of his employment was an invalid restraint on trade in violation of section 16600 of the California Business and Professions Code. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:41 pm
In Edwards v Arthur Andersen (2008), 44 Cal 4th 937, the Court, in the employment context, held there was no limited restraint exception to § 16600 and rejected any reasonability analysis. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am
Author: Luis Blanquez California’s long-standing public policy in favor of employee mobility over an employer’s ability to prohibit any worker from going to work for a competitor is included in California Business & Professions Code Section 16600. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:43 pm
Ting began his career as a real estate financial advisor, gaining practical experience in fiscal management and property assessment while working at Arthur Andersen and CB Richard Ellis. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:00 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
• “[W]e recognize that the base lodestar figure amounts for most of the relevant Arthur Andersen(30) considerations. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 946-47 (2008). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 pm
Arthur Andersen was among the oldest public accounting firms in the country and one of the “Big Five. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
In Ossining, the Court of Appeals discussed its decision in Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co. (65 NY2d 536, 551 [1985], amended 66 NY2d 812 [1985]), and clarified that the three-part Credit Alliance test for negligent misrepresentation claims against non privy parties (id. at 551 [holding that the near-privity requirements include that non privy party (1) was aware the work was to be used for a particular purpose, (2) the work was prepared… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
UTSW DVA Healthcare LLP (578 S.W.3d 469), the Court addressed two different methods of calculating fees – the 8-factor test from the Arthur Andersen case (945 S.W.2d 812) versus the lodestar method – concluding that the lodestar method is the right place to start in calculating fees. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
UTSW DVA Healthcare LLP (578 S.W.3d 469), the Court addressed two different methods of calculating fees – the 8-factor test from the Arthur Andersen case (945 S.W.2d 812) versus the lodestar method – concluding that the lodestar method is the right place to start in calculating fees. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am
GE France relies generally on the deeply seated policy in favor of arbitral resolution of disputes and specifically on the Supreme Court’s holding in an earlier case, Arthur Andersen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 6:42 am
Attorney fees under the statute are governed by the 1997, Texas Supreme Court opinion, Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP, recognized that under this broad right, “an employer cannot by contract restrain a former employee from engaging in his or her profession, trade or business, unless the agreement falls within one of the exceptions to the rule” [i.e., concerning the sale of a business, partnership or LLC interest]. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:05 pm
Bloomberg Tax, Reborn Arthur Andersen Chases Global Legal, Tax Work; Shuns Audit: Seventeen years after the collapse of accounting giant Arthur Andersen, a group of its former partners are aggressively expanding the resurrected Andersen name internationally into legal and tax advising. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:00 pm
Arthur Andersen shred tons and tons of documents as Enron was unraveling. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am
Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F.3d 1085 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
