Search for: "Ash, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:05 pm by David Jensen
The company involved in the treatment is Fate Therapeutics, Inc., of San Diego, a publicly traded firm working on induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) that have been genetically engineered to enhance their anti-tumor activity. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 6:56 am by Carmella Campisano
All pet owners concerned about these issues should consider including their desired options in their wills and/or trusts so that their wishes are followed to the extent they are legally valid. [1] American Pet Products Association Inc. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Smoke and ash from a wildfire damaged both its potted plants and its harvested buds. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
There is a threshold requirement: in order to be actionable, an interference must attain a certain level of seriousness (McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73[12], Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EMLR 21 [28]–[30]). [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
First Energy Corporation, a putative class of plaintiffs living near a former landfill filed trespass, nuisance, negligence, and medical monitoring claims against First Energy Corporation and NRG Energy, Inc., alleging that each Defendant was liable for claims arising from their respective subsidiaries’ disposal of coal ash in the landfill. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Ash nonetheless handed Nedal a partial if pyrrhic victory on the issue of his brothers using company funds to pay legal fees in the dissolution action, holding that, consistent with the Appellate Division, First Department’s 1985 decision in Matter of Public Relations Aids, Inc., company funds may be used for legal fees following — but not before — the election to purchase the petitioner’s shares. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:46 am by Jon Hyman
” Favorite recent episode: “I press human ashes into vinyl records. [read post]