Search for: "Askew v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
However, a case which took place in a neighboring state may not be proper to bring in NY. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm
Askew has been involved in numerous cases on appeal, including the recent cases of Arkansas Blue Cross v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
The case is Chaney v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
In Herring v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm
Lilly Ledbetter, plaintiff, Ledbetter v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:10 am
Askew v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:54 am
In Askew v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Yusuf, No. 07-3308 Unpaid taxes are "proceeds" of mail fraud for purposes of sufficiently stating an international money laundering offense. . [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:28 pm
Circuit today issued an order granting rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 5:04 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
