Search for: "Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 10:44 am by David M. McLain
At the beginning of September 2016, the Colorado Court of Appeals again weighed in on the definition of “substantial completion” for work completed by subcontractors and design professionals in Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
The Government must evaluate reasonableness based on the particular contractor’s operations, rather than a “universal, objective determination of what the cost would have been to other contractors at large. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 11:02 am by Joshua Richman
” The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), National Fire Protection Association Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Elliot Setzer
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), while the state argued that Rumsfeld v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am by John Lewis
Based on its prior decisions, the panel held that the residual clause “extends to both transportation workers who transport goods as well as those who transport passengers,” citing Tenney Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:42 pm
Jerry Ryce Masonry, Inc., et al., the State of Illinois brings an action under the new Employee Classification Act (820 ILCS 185/1), a recent act that we wrote about here. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:53 am by Adam Baker
That decision, R. v Ron Engineering, created the Contract A / Contract B framework which is at the core of Canadian bidding and tendering law. [read post]