Search for: "Associated Merchandise Group, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Houston College of Law, Inc., No. 16-CV-1839 (S.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
Fred Meyer, Inc., 390 U.S. 341 (1968), the Federal Trade Commission issued its Guides for Advertising Allowances and Other Merchandising Payments and Services, codified at 16 CFR, Part 240 (1969). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:43 am
" In re Sarah Marie Duncan d/b/a Loved by Hannah and Eli, Inc., Serial No. 86923714 (February 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:02 am
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1122 [central issue decided was that employer could not deduct pro rata share of commissions from all employees for returns where salesperson could not be identified; “[a]s to those items of merchandise the customer decides to keep, the sales associate has clearly earned his or her commission at the moment the sales documents are completed and the customer takes possession of the purchased items. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
Autodesk, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Gore & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Gore & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Gore & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:25 am
Major League Baseball Players Association and Aaron Judge v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
Keatley claimed that Teranet Inc., the defendant, infringed their rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Products marketed under AVELA’s licenses employ iconic film characters’ pictures to associate the products with Warner’s films, not to copy the film itself. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
" Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This argument failed in the merchandising context in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., No. 15-974 (defining an abstract idea) Biogen MA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
The Federal Circuit has ruled that the total profit applies to the article of manufacture (here a mobile phone) while Samsung argues that the profit should be reduced to the profits associated with the component at issue (the screen). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:06 am
Additional Resources: Barnie’s Bar & Grill, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm
See Magic Wand Inc. v. [read post]
