Search for: "Asus Computer International, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 11:39 am by Mike McCabe
(“MPS”), ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International America (“collectively, “ASUS”), and Microsemi Corporation (“Microsemi”) (collectively, the “Respondents”). [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:14 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(“Rambus”) accused Respondents NVIDIA Corporation, Asustek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., BFG Technologies, Inc., Biostar Microtech (USA) Corp., Biostar Microtech International Corp., Diablotek Inc., EVGA Corp., G.B.T. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:14 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted-in-part Respondents Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and ASUS Computer International’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to strike certain hearing testimony of Complainants O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., Apple Inc., AsusTek Computer, Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents are Monolithic Power Systems Inc., Microsemi Corporation, ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International America (collectively, the “Respondents”). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:44 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(“NVIDIA”); Asustek Computer Inc.; ASUS Computer International, Inc.; BFG Technologies, Inc.; Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents in this investigation are:  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung International, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Apple Inc.; AsusTek Computer, Inc.; Asus Computer International, Inc.; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.; Kingston Technology Co., Inc.; Kingston Technology (Shanghai)… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:43 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The Complainant in this investigation is Rambus Inc. and the Respondents are NVIDIA Corp.; Asustek Computer Inc.; ASUS Computer International, Inc.; BFG Technologies, Inc.; Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
Philip Adams found himself in this precarious situation when he brought a patent infringement action against ASUSTEK Computer, Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively hereinafter "ASUS") alleging spoliation of relevant evidence. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:57 pm
  (collectively, "O2 Micro") seeking sales and/or importation data stored in the electronic systems of Respondents Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asus Computer International (collectively, "ASUS"). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:26 pm
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied: (1) respondents Asustek Computer, Inc.'s, Asus Computer International's, and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s (collectively, "Respondents") motion to strike the rebuttal expert report of complainants O2 Micro International Ltd.'s and O2 Micro Inc.'s   (collectively, "O2 Micro") expert witness and prevent him from testifying at… [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
- 17% of young in Hong Kong don’t know they are breaking copyright law when illegally downloading (Innovationpartners)   Ireland High Court order forcing Eircom to block Pirate Bay doesn’t persuade UPC to do the same (1709 Copyright Blog)   Netherlands Mininova ordered to remove all ‘infringing’ torrents (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica)   Romania Pirate Bay clone threatened by Romanian RIAA (TorrentFreak)   Sweden The Pirate… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
Finnegan represents respondents Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and ASUS Computer International America (collectively, "MPS and ASUS") in the investigation. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California Dell,… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica)   New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)   Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP)   Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak)   Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46)   Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica)   United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents How to patent software… [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:26 am
Asus Computer International, 2-06-cv-00348(TXED May 21, 2009, Order) (Everingham, M.J.) [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
: IceTV v Nine Network (IP Think Tank) (Allens Arthur Robinson) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Canada Quebec Superior Court judge approves class action copyright case concerning inclusion of freelance articles in online database: Electronic-Rights Defence Committee v Southam Inc (ipblog.ca) CIRA domain name dispute panel finds reverse hijacking in case involving forsale.ca (Michael Geist) Canadian music pirates of 1897 (BoingBoing) (Excess Copyright) (Innovationpartners)… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:01 pm
Adams & Associates (“Adams”), alleged that defendants ASUSTEK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively “ASUS”) spoliated relevant evidence and should therefore be sanctioned. [read post]