Search for: "At & T COMMUNICATIONS v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2008, 3:09 pm
The shape of the Artisan mixer is registered as a Community trade mark. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The post Kylie v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am
Laddie J reached much the same conclusion, back in 1995 in Mercury Communications v Mercury Interactive [1995] FSR 850. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 7:18 am
In United Food v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Accounts of profits: CRISTAL clear when the other side doesn’t show upChampagne Louis Roederer v J Garcia Carrion [2017] EWHC 289(February 2017)Benny tasting some champagneMost trade mark cases are heard by way of split trial. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Nevertheless, he seems to have got his answer in Case T-621/14 Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM and, although the matter is by no means ‘hot news’ at this point, it still merits some discussion.Infocit lodged an application for a Community trade mark for the word “DINKOOL” in respect of several goods in classes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12, 16, 20 and 21. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
Last year the General Court of the European Union heard some 300 Community trade mark (CTM) cases, of which around 10% go on appeal to the CJEU, while only five references for a preliminary ruling were made during that period. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:37 pm
But Samuel Clemens can't claim to be Mark Twain in my business dealings with him (if it matters to me that he is in fact Mark Twain). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:10 pm
Anyway, this is Laura's tale:Coca-Cola will be glad about the outcome of Case T-384/13 Intermark srl v OHIM, The Coca-Cola Company, which represents an important victory in the company's efforts to protect its famous chromatic combination and script. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
Mr Hobbs QC considered the relevant authorities including the judgment of Arnold J in Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) at [130] to [138] and the EU General Court's decision in Copernicus Trademarks (Case T‑82/14) ECLI:EU:T:2016:396. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
’AG Wahl advised the CJEU to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék as follows:(1) [Answering questions 1 and 2, correctly in this Kat's view] For the purposes of Article 4(3) ... [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
In Case T‑396/11, ultra air v OHIM - Donaldson Filtration Deutschland, the General Court examined the applicability of the concept of 'abuse of rights', in relation to an application for a declaration of invalidity of a Community trade mark, under Articles 56(1)(a), 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Petre, Southern Illinois Univ, Carbondale; James T. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Today in the Community we consider whether the Justices should (or will) grant cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
