Search for: "Atkins, Appeal of" Results 41 - 60 of 499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2023, 6:53 pm by Howard Bashman
The post “The need for Supreme Court ethics reforms transcends party lines; These latest revelations underscore that efforts to bring transparency and accountability to the court should be bipartisan; Actually, they should be nonpartisan” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mitchell, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1899 (08 September 2009) Burns, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1907 (03 September 2009) Truong, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1910 (01 September 2009) Atkins & Anor v R [2009] EWCA Crim 1876 (02 October 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Phillips & Anor v McGregor-Paterson [2009] EWHC 2385 (Ch) (02 [...] [read post]
27 May 2004, 10:30 am
The NYT also highlights former Alabama chief justice Moore's plan to appeal his removal for refusing to remove a Ten Commandments [read post]
16 Feb 2004, 10:48 pm
In Tuesday's US law and business press, the Texas Lawyer reports that the TX Court of Criminal Appeals has set standards to follow for Atkins v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:55 am
"Tom Brady's 4-game suspension reinstated by court": Kim Atkins of The Boston Herald has this report. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit considered that claim in June. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:11 am
The trial court recommended the sentence be commuted to life and the appeals court Wednesday agreed. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 5:37 pm by Howard Bashman
The post “Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor aren’t letting the Supreme Court go down without a fight; Steamrolled by a right-wing majority twice their size, the liberal bloc is wielding words as weapons to expose the danger of the conservative legal agenda” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:02 am by B.W. Barnett
  In an application for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Hearn asserts that he is mentally retarded and, pursuant to the Supreme Court holding in Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am by Stephen Wermiel
Another round of appeals continued, and when Atkins was decided, Hall’s lawyers challenged the constitutionality of Florida’s law governing the execution of the intellectually disabled. [read post]