Search for: "Attorney General v. Clarke" Results 41 - 60 of 992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2008, 7:46 am
But Robert Keen Jr., attorney for Camelia Clark, said the authorized acts aren't closely related enough to the battery to allow them to use the narrow exception. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
Uncovering Clarke Terrace challenges conventional narratives pigeonholing Motley as an education attorney. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
The Attorney General v Universal Projects Limited and The Attorney General v Keron Matthews, heard 7 July 2011. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
In such circumstances, the court has generally has held that a litigant will not be bound by an attorney’s statements during negotiations unless the client has “specifically authorized” the attorney to bind him or her. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:13 am
See generally President Signs New Attorney-Client Privilege Rule (FRE 502). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:23 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Attorney General Reference No. 116 of 2009 [2010] EWCA Crim 577 (11 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MC (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 347 (31 March 2010) Raissi v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 337 (31 March 2010) Clarke & Anor v Corless & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 338 (31 March 2010) Child Maintenance and… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 10:50 am by Geoff Schweller
Earlier this year, Clark was also allegedly involved in efforts to oust the Attorney General and overturn the presidential election. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Attorney General v Universal Projects Limited and The Attorney General v Keron Matthews, heard 7 July 2011. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by Kent Scheidegger
In addition to the excerpts from the Attorney General's brief in the Clark Elmore case, noted here, readers may also wish to consider the following excerpts from the opinion of the Supreme Court of Washington: 1. [read post]