Search for: "Austin v. Richards" Results 41 - 60 of 362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
When UT-Austin was temporarily barred from using race by a 1996 Fifth Circuit ruling in the case of Hopwood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
I understand, for instance, that written submissions on this judgment were requested by the Court of Appeal in LB Southwark v Austin, in which we await the handing down of the CoA judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:54 pm
Richard has had a very active year in the housing field having appeared in Manchester CC v Pinnock, R (Weaver) v L&Q, Hanoman v LB Southwark and Austin v LB Southwark; (b) Jan Luba QC outlining the expected developments in housing law in 2010. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
” At the American College of Environmental Lawyers, Andrea Field discusses the Court’s recent decision in Perez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
"  It is co-organized by Richard Albert and myself, though Richard has done the primary work in getting a remarkable array of scholars from around the world who will be discussing the obviously crucial topic. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Ann Richards touted tripling the size of the prison system as a means of rural economic development which she hoped would help stave off a GOP takeover of the state. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:45 am
October 29, 2015, Austin, TX, noon-1 PM (tentative time), : “The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:11 am by Conor McEvily
University of Texas at Austin continues with posts from Richard Kahlenberg and Stuart Taylor, Jr. and Richard Sander. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
Other coverage comes from Thomas Merrill for this blog, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jeremy P. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
 The ACLU’s Benjamin Wizner argued for the petitioner, and Sidley Austin’s Richard Klingler and Baker Hostetler’s David Rivkin argued for the respondents. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Richard Rothstein
University of Texas at Austin (2013) was before the Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
 In addition to its clear and explicit articulation of the need to rule out random and systematic error before proceeding to a consideration of Sir Austin’s nine guidelines, Sir Richard Doll’s 2002 essay is instructive for judges and lawyers, for other reasons. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
University of Texas at Austin and were among the counsel to Representative F. [read post]